<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Some Rules Are Begging To Be Broken</title>
	<link>http://noisetank.com/hugeasscity/2008/04/05/some-rules-are-begging-to-be-broken/</link>
	<description>Smart Growth defined: Making the car an option, not a necessity.*</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 04:35:14 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Apartments Coming To The Neighborhoods &#124; hugeasscity</title>
		<link>http://noisetank.com/hugeasscity/2008/04/05/some-rules-are-begging-to-be-broken/#comment-1622</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 18:09:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://noisetank.com/hugeasscity/2008/04/05/some-rules-are-begging-to-be-broken/#comment-1622</guid>
					<description>[...] 2203 East Union, Central District; 93 units; J C Mueller LLC; designed by Mithun. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] 2203 East Union, Central District; 93 units; J C Mueller LLC; designed by Mithun. [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: flotown</title>
		<link>http://noisetank.com/hugeasscity/2008/04/05/some-rules-are-begging-to-be-broken/#comment-1335</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Apr 2008 15:54:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://noisetank.com/hugeasscity/2008/04/05/some-rules-are-begging-to-be-broken/#comment-1335</guid>
					<description>Hardipanel, metal, vinyl windows - change some of those elements to get the upzone I say</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hardipanel, metal, vinyl windows - change some of those elements to get the upzone I say
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://noisetank.com/hugeasscity/2008/04/05/some-rules-are-begging-to-be-broken/#comment-1319</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Apr 2008 07:40:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://noisetank.com/hugeasscity/2008/04/05/some-rules-are-begging-to-be-broken/#comment-1319</guid>
					<description>Posted too soon.

Couldn't they be granted a variance which would cover the difference? If not, the neighborhood boards should be allowed to vary specific projects at their discression. An up-zone requires a city council-vote, which seems like WAY too high a bar to be crossed in this case.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Posted too soon.</p>
<p>Couldn&#8217;t they be granted a variance which would cover the difference? If not, the neighborhood boards should be allowed to vary specific projects at their discression. An up-zone requires a city council-vote, which seems like WAY too high a bar to be crossed in this case.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://noisetank.com/hugeasscity/2008/04/05/some-rules-are-begging-to-be-broken/#comment-1318</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Apr 2008 07:38:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://noisetank.com/hugeasscity/2008/04/05/some-rules-are-begging-to-be-broken/#comment-1318</guid>
					<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;If we can’t put a six-story building there, we can’t in good conscience utter another word about how green we supposedly are.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

AMEN!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>If we can’t put a six-story building there, we can’t in good conscience utter another word about how green we supposedly are.</p></blockquote>
<p>AMEN!
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: 953</title>
		<link>http://noisetank.com/hugeasscity/2008/04/05/some-rules-are-begging-to-be-broken/#comment-1317</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Apr 2008 06:10:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://noisetank.com/hugeasscity/2008/04/05/some-rules-are-begging-to-be-broken/#comment-1317</guid>
					<description>are we really fooling ourselves.  since when is 2 stories the make or break in gentrifying seattle.  the neighborhood suffers from neglect, I agree.  but if we are really interested in gentrification and 'society as a whole' we shouldn't be looking at making exceptions for one development but density building in the zoning structure on a more systematic level.  otherwise we just favor those folks who are looking for a good deal and less interested in the community they are moving into.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>are we really fooling ourselves.  since when is 2 stories the make or break in gentrifying seattle.  the neighborhood suffers from neglect, I agree.  but if we are really interested in gentrification and &#8217;society as a whole&#8217; we shouldn&#8217;t be looking at making exceptions for one development but density building in the zoning structure on a more systematic level.  otherwise we just favor those folks who are looking for a good deal and less interested in the community they are moving into.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: dave</title>
		<link>http://noisetank.com/hugeasscity/2008/04/05/some-rules-are-begging-to-be-broken/#comment-1316</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Apr 2008 05:28:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://noisetank.com/hugeasscity/2008/04/05/some-rules-are-begging-to-be-broken/#comment-1316</guid>
					<description>The developer said that if it's only 4 stories, the building (assuming it got built) would not have underground parking, so instead of ground floor retail, you'd get ground floor parking -- ugh.  That right there justifies the upzone for me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The developer said that if it&#8217;s only 4 stories, the building (assuming it got built) would not have underground parking, so instead of ground floor retail, you&#8217;d get ground floor parking &#8212; ugh.  That right there justifies the upzone for me.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: danb</title>
		<link>http://noisetank.com/hugeasscity/2008/04/05/some-rules-are-begging-to-be-broken/#comment-1315</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Apr 2008 03:39:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://noisetank.com/hugeasscity/2008/04/05/some-rules-are-begging-to-be-broken/#comment-1315</guid>
					<description>Greg, as far as I know there is no explicit public benefit such as affordable housing being offered by the developer in exchange for the upzone.  But as I see it, the public benefit of simply having a building on that site is huge.  The site has sat unused for seven years and the whole neighborhood has suffered for it.  The developer has said that he can not make a quality project pencil with four stories.  The fact that no one else has attempted to develop a 4-story building there over seven years lends credence to the developer's claim.  My biggest fear is that if the upzone is not granted, we'll end up with a much crappier 4-story project, or nothing at all for years to come.  In my view, the developer is not an enemy who will be getting something for nothing if the upzone happens.  I am grateful that the developer is proposing to bring us a well-designed project at an appropriate scale in a neighborhood that has suffered from neglect for decades.  

Your question about how the project addresses the needs of the neighborhood is a good one.  In the short term, what that corner needs more than anything is lots of eyes on the street.  The issues of race, poverty and gentrification in the Central District are complex and deeply rooted in our society as a whole.  In what way do you think that site should be developed in order to address these issues head on?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Greg, as far as I know there is no explicit public benefit such as affordable housing being offered by the developer in exchange for the upzone.  But as I see it, the public benefit of simply having a building on that site is huge.  The site has sat unused for seven years and the whole neighborhood has suffered for it.  The developer has said that he can not make a quality project pencil with four stories.  The fact that no one else has attempted to develop a 4-story building there over seven years lends credence to the developer&#8217;s claim.  My biggest fear is that if the upzone is not granted, we&#8217;ll end up with a much crappier 4-story project, or nothing at all for years to come.  In my view, the developer is not an enemy who will be getting something for nothing if the upzone happens.  I am grateful that the developer is proposing to bring us a well-designed project at an appropriate scale in a neighborhood that has suffered from neglect for decades.  </p>
<p>Your question about how the project addresses the needs of the neighborhood is a good one.  In the short term, what that corner needs more than anything is lots of eyes on the street.  The issues of race, poverty and gentrification in the Central District are complex and deeply rooted in our society as a whole.  In what way do you think that site should be developed in order to address these issues head on?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Greg</title>
		<link>http://noisetank.com/hugeasscity/2008/04/05/some-rules-are-begging-to-be-broken/#comment-1307</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Apr 2008 20:31:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://noisetank.com/hugeasscity/2008/04/05/some-rules-are-begging-to-be-broken/#comment-1307</guid>
					<description>Do you know the specific benefits that rezoning this from 4 to 6 stories will give us? Will these extra two stories qualify for an affordability bonus? 

Oh yeah, and will this building solve the neighborhood's problems by addressing them head on or is it just gentrifying them away?

Or am I just hyperventilating by asking these kind of questions?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do you know the specific benefits that rezoning this from 4 to 6 stories will give us? Will these extra two stories qualify for an affordability bonus? </p>
<p>Oh yeah, and will this building solve the neighborhood&#8217;s problems by addressing them head on or is it just gentrifying them away?</p>
<p>Or am I just hyperventilating by asking these kind of questions?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.257 seconds -->
